Special Report: Government-Issued Digital Identity - Implementations in the US, UK, and Europe

Digital identity programs are transforming how citizens prove who they are both online and in person. In a recent commentary in The Times, Tony Blair emphasized that embracing technology—including digital identity and face recognition—provides governments with the tools to modernize public services while countering populism and enhancing crime prevention. Governments in the United States, United Kingdom, and across Europe are now rolling out centralized digital identity cards and systems that leverage advanced verification technologies. These systems aim to enhance security, prevent fraud, and streamline access to services while empowering citizens with robust, government-issued credentials.

Overview: Digital ID and Verification Technologies

A digital identity (digital ID) is an electronic record or credential that represents a person. It allows individuals to prove their identity remotely or via smart devices, often as a counterpart to a physical ID document. Modern digital ID systems typically combine two pillars​:

• ID Document Verification: Confirming a government-issued ID (passport, driver’s license, national ID card, etc.) is authentic and belongs to the user. This involves checking security features on the document or reading embedded data (like a chip) to ensure it’s real and not tampered with​. For example, mobile apps can scan the Machine Readable Zone (MRZ) or even use NFC to read a passport’s biometric chip, validating its digital signatures against issuing authority data. Optical checks of holograms, UV features, and other document traits by AI further help authenticate the ID. In short, the system verifies “Is this ID genuine?”
• Biometric Verification: Confirming the person presenting the ID is alive and is the right person. Typically this means using facial recognition to match a selfie or live video of the user to the photo on their ID (or a stored reference image)​. Other biometrics like fingerprints or iris scans can also be used, but face matching is common for remote identity proofing. Crucially, a liveness detection check is integrated to ensure the selfie is captured from a real, live person and not a spoof (like a printed photo or mask)​. Liveness detection algorithms analyze facial movements, depth, lighting, and prompts (such as blinking or head-turning) to confirm the presence of a live user, blocking attempts with fake images​. In essence, this pillar verifies “Is the user physically present and do they biometrically match the ID owner?”

When someone enrolls for a digital ID or uses it to access a service, these technologies work in concert. For example, a typical remote verification flow might have the user scan their passport with a smartphone app, then take a selfie. The system automatically checks the document’s authenticity and matches the face in the live selfie to the passport photo, while performing real-time liveness checks​. If everything passes, the person is verified and their digital identity credential can be issued or used. This multi-factor process provides a high level of assurance and security, raising the bar against identity theft. According to industry experts, replacing old knowledge-based methods (passwords, security questions) with biometrics makes it significantly harder for bad actors to impersonate someone​.

Below we delve into how the US, UK, and Europe are implementing such digital identity systems, followed by real-world case studies that demonstrate the benefits.

United States: Emerging Digital Identity Initiatives

The United States has historically lacked a single national digital ID, relying on state-issued IDs (like driver’s licenses) and a patchwork of federal login systems. In recent years, however, government and industry efforts have accelerated to provide secure digital identity verification for online services and even air travel. These initiatives use face recognition and document authentication to combat fraud and improve user experience.

One prominent development is the rise of remote identity proofing for government benefits and services. Many state unemployment agencies and federal programs turned to online identity verification vendors during the pandemic to tackle rampant identity fraud. For instance, the Internal Revenue Service and dozens of state workforce agencies deployed solutions that let users upload an ID and selfie; in fact, 24 of 53 state workforce agencies hired identity verification contractors using facial recognition technology​. These systems compare the applicant’s selfie to their photo ID and perform liveness checks to ensure the person is real, helping weed out fraudulent claims. The U.S. General Services Administration has also announced that its own login portal, Login.gov, will offer an option for identity verification with facial recognition​. This marks a shift toward embracing biometrics at the federal level to strengthen authentication for public services.

Another major step in the U.S. is the introduction of Mobile Driver’s Licenses (mDLs) – a form of government-issued digital ID stored in a smartphone. Several states now provide digital driver’s licenses that citizens can add to an app or phone wallet, and these are being accepted in some scenarios like airport security. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is piloting digital ID checks at select airports, where travelers can tap or scan their digital license instead of a physical ID​. The system will capture the traveler’s photo on-site and compare it with the ID info using facial recognition, verifying their identity matches the credential​. According to TSA, this allows passengers to “securely and seamlessly” share their ID information through facial recognition at checkpoints​. Participation is voluntary, but it points to the convenience of digital IDs – no need to fumble for a card; a quick QR code or NFC tap and a face scan can confirm you are you.

Beyond travel, federal agencies are working on a broader national digital identity strategy. While still in early stages, efforts are underway to establish standards and pilots for a unified digital ID infrastructure in the U.S.​ The goal is to enable Americans to securely prove who they are online for any government service – moving away from the current jumble of passwords and knowledge-based questions that are vulnerable to breaches​. Key technical components include biometric logins and strong identity proofing. For example, NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) has updated its digital identity guidelines, and DHS is testing liveness detection rigorously to ensure the technology’s reliability. The general trend in the U.S. is toward improved security and fraud prevention in digital identity: using face matching and document verification to stop identity thieves, while giving legitimate users a faster, easier way to access services. Early results are promising – agencies report that biometric verification has added a valuable layer of defense against scammers and impostors attempting to use stolen data​.

United Kingdom: Toward a Unified Digital Identity

The United Kingdom has had a complex journey toward digital identity, but recent efforts are consolidating into a more centralized, government-controlled system. The UK does not have a mandatory national ID card, and a previous digital identity initiative (“Gov.uk Verify”) had limited success. Now, the government is implementing a new GOV.UK One Login platform that aims to provide a single secure identity for citizens across all government services​. A core feature of One Login is rigorous identity verification using document checks and facial biometrics.

To create a One Login account with a verified identity, users can use the GOV.UK ID Check app on a smartphone. The process is highly illustrative of modern digital ID verification: the app will prompt the user to scan their photo ID and take a selfie. It then checks that the ID document is real, that the user is a live person (liveness check), and that their face matches the photo on the ID (likeness check)​. Supported documents include passports (with biometric chips), driver’s licenses, and biometric residence permits. The inclusion of e-passports suggests the app can read the chip data for strong document authentication. If users cannot use the app, there are alternative routes like in-person verification at a post office or answering credit-record-based security questions​, but the highest assurance comes from the biometric method.

This approach in the UK leverages facial recognition in a controlled, consent-based manner – the user’s selfie is matched to their official ID photo to prove “you are who you claim to be.” Combined with liveness detection (to prevent spoofing), it provides a high level of confidence. The fact that One Login requires this for accessing various services (taxes, benefits, licenses, etc.) means once an individual passes the process, they have a trusted digital identity credential. Dozens of government services are integrating with One Login, and it’s becoming a gateway to everything from checking pension information to applying for visas​. This centralization offers convenience (one account instead of many) and security (consistently strong checks).

Importantly, the UK government is also working on the policy side – establishing a digital identity trust framework to govern how private sector and public sector identities can interoperate securely​. While the One Login system is government-controlled, it is informed by standards to ensure privacy and data protection. For example, personal data used for verification (like face biometrics) is handled under strict rules and not used for other purposes. The UK’s move to a single digital identity aligns it more with European allies that have long had national eIDs. Early signs are positive, with successful onboarding of users through the app. The use of robust verification techniques (chip-scanning IDs and face matching with liveness) has improved fraud resistance, helping to catch fake ID attempts or imposters. At the same time, it simplifies user experience: people can verify their identity once and reuse that digital credential rather than submitting documents over and over to different agencies.

Europe: National eIDs and Cross-Border Identity

Europe is generally ahead in the deployment of government-issued digital identity cards. Many European countries introduced national eID cards in the 2000s, providing citizens with smart ID cards that double as digital identity tokens. These cards (e.g. in Estonia, Belgium, Germany, Spain, etc.) typically contain a secure chip and allow the holder to authenticate online and digitally sign documents using PIN codes and certificates. The result is a widespread adoption of digital identity in everyday life – for instance, citizens using their eID to file taxes, access healthcare, or even vote online (as in Estonia).

A hallmark of European digital identity is the eIDAS regulation, an EU-wide framework that ensures mutual recognition of national eIDs across member states. Under eIDAS, if a country has a notified digital ID scheme, other EU countries must recognize it for online services requiring identification​. This has driven countries to raise their identity assurance to common high standards. For example, many eID cards in Europe use Qualified electronic signatures and are issued at high assurance levels, often requiring in-person identity proofing to obtain. An evolution of eIDAS is now underway (eIDAS 2.0) which will introduce a European Digital Identity Wallet – essentially a mobile app that can store a person’s national digital IDs and credentials in a user-friendly way. The aim is to let any EU citizen identify themselves securely via smartphone for both public and private services, anywhere in Europe.

European implementations vary by country, but they share common technical features:

• Smartcard-based IDs: Most countries issue a physical ID card with a chip that holds the citizen’s data and cryptographic keys. This chip can be read to authenticate the ID and performs digital signing. For example, Belgium’s eID and Estonia’s ID-card have enabled legally binding digital signatures for years. Usage is high; by 2020 Belgium had over 28 million electronic ID cards issued (including for foreigners and children)​, and the numbers keep growing as services expand.
• Mobile eID solutions: Several countries offer mobile extensions. Estonia introduced Mobile-ID (SIM-based digital ID) and more recently Smart-ID (an app) to let people authenticate without a card reader. Nordic countries took a different route with bank-backed IDs like Sweden’s BankID and Denmark’s MitID, which are used by over 90% of their populations for a broad range of online transactions​. While BankID is operated by private banks, it’s effectively a national digital ID in practice, used for government and banking alike. These solutions use a mix of PINs and device biometrics for user login, but the initial issuance still relies on government ID proofing.
• Biometric verification for onboarding: European eID programs traditionally issued IDs in person (applying at an office with document checks). Now, to boost convenience, some countries are adding remote onboarding with biometrics. For instance, the government of Estonia worked with a vendor to enable secure facial verification for their digital identity program, allowing new users (like e-residents) to enroll remotely​. The technology (by iProov) performs a “passive facial verification” with liveness to ensure the person is legitimate​. This reflects a broader European trend to incorporate smartphone-based face verification as a complement to physical ID issuance, especially accelerated by COVID-19 making remote processes more necessary.

One of the most successful examples is Estonia, often called the poster child of digital government. Let’s look at that case in more detail, as well as a contrasting case from outside Europe, India’s Aadhaar program, to see how digital identity initiatives can achieve large-scale success.

Case Study: Estonia’s e-Identity Program

Nearly every Estonian has a digital identity. Estonia’s mandatory national ID card (credit-card sized with a chip) serves as both a physical ID and a digital authentication token. These citizens can use their ID-cards or mobile-ID to securely access hundreds of e-services.​

Estonia has pioneered digital identity for over two decades. Since the early 2000s, every Estonian citizen and resident receives a state-issued digital ID as part of their national ID card​. This system (simply called eID) is the foundation of Estonia’s digital society. The ID card, paired with a PIN, allows individuals to prove their identity online with the highest level of security, equivalent to in-person identification. It also enables digital signatures that are legally equivalent to handwritten signatures. Over the years, Estonia expanded the ecosystem with Mobile-ID and Smart-ID to further ease use via phones​.

Key features and outcomes of Estonia’s digital ID:

• Near-universal adoption: As of 2022, 99% of Estonia’s population has a digital identity credential​. Possession of the ID card is mandatory, which helped achieve this coverage. Citizens use their eIDs constantly – to pay taxes, access health records, vote online, bank, and more​. In fact, an average Estonian saves about 5 workdays per year in time thanks to digital signatures and transactions replacing paperwork​. Over 1 billion digital signatures have been executed using these identities​.
• Security through strong cryptography and biometrics: The Estonian ID card’s chip carries a protected digital certificate for signing and authentication. Using it requires PIN codes only the user knows, making it a two-factor system (something you have – the card, and something you know – the PIN). Attempts to hack or clone these chips are infeasible due to encryption. Additionally, newer developments integrate biometric verification for remote uses. The government partnered with providers to use face recognition with liveness when people access certain services or apply for things like e-Residency remotely​. This adds an extra layer when the card itself isn’t present, bridging physical and digital identity proof.
• Minimal identity fraud: Estonia’s track record on identity security is impressive. In two decades, no identity theft has been reported from a failure of the digital ID technology itself​. In other words, there have been no known cases of someone’s identity being compromised by cracking the card or digital system. Officials note that any misuse tends to come from human factors (like someone sharing their PIN with a family member) rather than technical breaches​. This level of security builds tremendous trust among the public. Knowing that the system has not been hacked bolsters confidence to use it broadly.
• Cross-border recognition and innovation: Estonia’s success influenced Europe’s broader policy (eIDAS) to ensure other nations catch up​. It was also the first to launch an e-Residency program, offering a digital ID to foreigners so they can remotely open Estonian (and EU) businesses​. This showcases how a robust digital ID can even be offered beyond a country’s citizens to drive economic growth. The country is continually innovating, exploring new ideas like digital identity wallets and advanced authentication (e.g., split-key cryptography to secure mobile credentials)​. These efforts ensure that convenience increases without compromising security.

Estonia’s case demonstrates the powerful benefits of a well-implemented digital identity program: extreme convenience, high security, and vast digital uptake. Citizens enjoy seamless interactions (imagine signing a contract from home in minutes) with assurance that their identities are protected. The program has also yielded efficiency gains for both users and government – less bureaucracy, faster transactions, and significant cost savings (printing less paper, needing fewer clerks for manual ID checks, etc.). It’s no surprise Estonia is often cited as a model for digital ID adoption​.

Case Study: India’s Aadhaar Biometric ID Program

On the other side of the world, India’s Aadhaar program stands as the largest digital identity system on the planet. Aadhaar is not a smartcard but rather a unique 12-digit identification number linked to an individual’s biometric data (fingerprints, iris scans, and face photo)​. Managed by the government (UIDAI authority), Aadhaar enrollment has exceeded 1.3 billion people, covering the vast majority of India’s 1.4 billion population​. It provides a foundational ID that residents can use to authenticate their identity for a host of services.

Key aspects and successes of Aadhaar:

• Biometric deduplication and security: Aadhaar was designed to give everyone a unique ID by ensuring no duplicate enrollments. When a person registers, their ten fingerprints, two iris scans, and face are captured. These biometrics are run through a database to make sure the person hasn’t already registered under another name​. This one-time biometric enrollment has dramatically reduced duplicate or fake identities in government welfare schemes. The biometric data is stored in a centralized database and can be used for authentication (typically via fingerprint or iris scan) when required. Biometric matching ensures “one person, one identity”, which fortifies the system against identity fraud.
• Massive inclusion and first IDs: Aadhaar has given formal identity to tens of millions of people who previously had no official ID papers​. As of 2021, over 94% of India’s population had Aadhaar, including many in rural and poor communities for whom this was the first proof of identity​. This empowers them to access services like banking, voting, and government benefits that require ID​. In other words, Aadhaar has been a great enabler of inclusion, bringing marginalized groups into the formal economy and society by simply allowing them to say “I am me” with credibility.
• Efficiency and fraud reduction in public services: Perhaps the biggest positive impact has been on government benefit distribution. By linking Aadhaar IDs to welfare programs (such as food rations, pensions, and subsidies), India established a verification step before benefits are delivered. Beneficiaries often have to authenticate via fingerprint or a One-Time Password tied to Aadhaar. This has cut down ghost beneficiaries and middlemen siphoning off benefits. According to the World Bank’s Digital Dividend report, India can save up to $10 billion annually by using Aadhaar to eliminate fraud and leakage in its welfare programs​. Indeed, certain subsidy programs were known to have 10–60% leakages before, which Aadhaar helped plug​. The cost of transactions has also dropped: transferring money or validating identity via Aadhaar e-KYC costs pennies, compared to several dollars previously​. All these translate to huge savings for the government and taxpayers, as well as more timely and accurate delivery of entitlements to the people.
• Digital ecosystem and private sector use: Aadhaar isn’t just for government. Banks, mobile phone companies, and fintech services have embraced it as a fast KYC (Know Your Customer) tool​. Opening a bank account, for example, used to require multiple documents and days of verification; with Aadhaar, it can be done electronically in minutes by verifying the customer’s Aadhaar details and biometric match. Over the years, India built additional layers like the Aadhaar Enabled Payment System and eSign, which allow secure payments and digital signing using one’s Aadhaar credentials. The result is a burgeoning digital economy where everything from getting a SIM card to accessing healthcare can leverage the same national digital ID backbone. Aadhaar has effectively become India’s digital identity rails, upon which countless services ride.

It’s worth noting that Aadhaar has faced its share of challenges and criticisms – from privacy concerns (it’s a centralized database of personal data) to legal challenges about making it mandatory. There have been debates on data security and instances of biometric authentication failures causing hardship. However, the program has continually evolved to address issues (adding features like masked Aadhaar IDs for privacy, biometric lock to prevent misuse, and improving fingerprint readers, etc.). From a positive perspective, Aadhaar’s benefits in preventing identity fraud, increasing administrative efficiency, and boosting inclusion have been substantial and internationally recognized​. It shows that with the right design and scale, a government digital ID can rapidly modernize a country’s service delivery and bring millions into the formal fold.

Benefits of Centralized Digital Identity Systems

The experiences of the US, UK, Europe, and case studies like Estonia and India underscore several key benefits of centralized government-controlled digital identity programs:

• Enhanced Security: Digital IDs with biometric verification greatly heighten security over traditional ID checks. It becomes extremely difficult for someone to impersonate another person. For example, requiring a face match with liveness means a thief can’t just steal your ID card; they’d also need to convincingly spoof your live face – a far higher bar. Estonia’s perfect record of no crypto-breaches in 20 years​ and the US TSA’s use of facial recognition to catch imposters at airports​ highlight how these technologies tighten identity security. By replacing passwords and knowledge-based questions with biometrics, agencies close avenues that hackers commonly exploit​. Biometric national IDs also help secure borders and public safety, as authorities can quickly verify individuals against watchlists with high accuracy, something countries worldwide are adopting​.
• Fraud Prevention: A central motive for digital ID programs is to combat fraud in both government and financial services. Biometric de-duplication (one person, one ID) stops individuals from creating multiple fake identities to game systems. India’s reduction of subsidy fraud by billions each year using Aadhaar is a prime example​. In the U.S. and UK, identity verification for unemployment or tax portals using face recognition has deterred criminals who would otherwise use stolen identities to file false claims​. Likewise, European banks using national eIDs or BankID have slashed identity fraud in banking. Liveness checks further prevent “presentation attacks” by fraudsters – DHS notes that liveness tech is critical to weed out spoof attempts in remote ID checks​. All together, these measures significantly reduce opportunities for ID-related fraud, saving money and protecting citizens from identity theft.
• Efficiency and Convenience: Digital identities streamline processes for both users and service providers. Citizens no longer need to present physical documents in person or go through lengthy paperwork to prove who they are. They can log in to services with a quick biometric scan or a PIN, and often reuse their verified digital ID across multiple services. The result is faster onboarding (opening a bank account in minutes, not days), faster access to benefits, and generally quicker transactions. Estonia’s eID saves each citizen days of time every year that would have been spent on bureaucratic tasks​. The UK’s One Login means users verify once and then seamlessly access various government services without repeated ID checks. For governments, digital ID cuts administrative overhead – automating what used to be manual verification labor. It also enables high-volume programs (like mass vaccination or aid distribution) to be managed efficiently by quickly verifying recipients​. In summary, digital IDs bring speed and simplicity to interactions that used to be slow and cumbersome, improving user experience and public sector productivity.
• Trust and Inclusion: When implemented well, a government digital ID program can increase public trust in digital transactions. Citizens trust that their government-vetted digital identity is secure and will be accepted widely, which encourages them to use online services more. As seen in Europe, high trust coupled with strong privacy safeguards leads to broad usage (e.g., Danes and Swedes using digital IDs for almost all daily transactions)​. Additionally, centralized digital IDs can promote inclusion by giving all residents, including the marginalized, a reliable way to identify themselves. Aadhaar did this at an unprecedented scale in India, giving the poor access to banking and services they were locked out of for lack of ID​. Similarly, many countries use digital ID to include immigrants or refugees in systems by issuing them secure IDs. The benefit is a more inclusive society where everyone can prove who they are and access their rights.

Challenges and Considerations

While the outlook for centralized digital identity is largely positive, it’s important to acknowledge and address the challenges and criticisms that arise:

• Privacy and Data Security: A government-controlled digital ID means a central authority manages sensitive personal data (biometrics, documents, etc.). This raises concerns about how that data is stored, used, and protected. Privacy advocates worry about potential surveillance or misuse if, for instance, biometric data is repurposed beyond identity verification. High-profile programs like Aadhaar have faced criticism for being a “big brother” database. To maintain public trust, governments must enforce strict data protection measures – encryption, anonymization, purpose limitation, and transparency. Many programs, especially in Europe, build privacy in by design (for example, biometric templates that can’t be reverse-engineered to images, and deleting selfies once verification is done​). Clear legal frameworks (like GDPR in Europe) and independent oversight help ensure that digital IDs empower citizens without invading their privacy.
• Enrollment and Accessibility: Not everyone finds it easy to navigate digital ID processes. Elderly or less tech-savvy individuals might struggle with smartphone verification apps or remembering PINs. There’s also the issue of biometric failures – some people’s fingerprints might be worn out (common in manual laborers), or facial recognition may have biases that make it less accurate for certain demographics. These challenges can cause exclusion if not proactively managed. Solutions include offering multiple verification options (as UK’s One Login does with in-person Post Office checks​), improving algorithm fairness, and ensuring accessibility features in apps. Enrollment campaigns also need to reach remote or disadvantaged communities (India, for example, set up thousands of enrollment centers across the country to include rural populations). The goal should be that digital ID supplements existing methods without cutting off those who can’t use digital channels.
• Infrastructure and Interoperability: Implementing a national digital ID requires significant technical infrastructure – secure servers, biometric devices or apps for capture, network connectivity, etc. Developing countries or smaller governments may struggle with these investments, though cloud and mobile technologies are lowering the barrier. Interoperability is another consideration: the digital ID should be usable across many services, which means different systems (banks, hospitals, government agencies) need to integrate with it. Initiatives like eIDAS in Europe set standards for this​, but elsewhere it can be a challenge to get widespread adoption by the private sector. Over time, as digital IDs prove their value (reducing fraud, easing compliance), more service providers come on board, creating a network effect.
• Public Perception and Trust: Lastly, any digital identity program must convince citizens that it is trustworthy, secure, and beneficial. Past failures or scandals can make people skeptical. For example, if facial recognition is mentioned, some worry about bias or misuse by law enforcement. Outreach and education are essential to highlight the voluntary nature and safeguards of these systems. In the U.S., for instance, TSA repeatedly emphasizes that its airport facial scans are optional and images aren’t stored. Demonstrating tangible benefits (like faster tax refunds or easier benefit claims) also helps win support. The generally positive reception in countries like Estonia and Denmark shows that when people see convenience and security, they embrace the change. It’s about building that trust through transparency, strong safeguards, and delivering value.

Conclusion

Centralized digital identity programs in the US, UK, and Europe – complemented by global examples like Estonia’s eID and India’s Aadhaar – are redefining how identity is verified in the modern world. These government-issued digital IDs leverage cutting-edge techniques from facial recognition to biometric matching and document forensics to ensure that “you are who you say you are,” online or offline, with a high degree of certainty. The technical foundations (biometric matching, liveness detection, secure document checks) provide both security and usability, a combination that has historically been hard to achieve with traditional IDs alone.

The benefits of these systems are already being realized in terms of reduced fraud, enhanced security, and greater efficiency. People can access services faster and more securely, while governments can deliver programs with less waste and more confidence in reaching the right individuals. From preventing identity theft to saving billions in taxpayer money by stopping fraud, the upside is significant​. Moreover, digital IDs are key enablers for digital economies – they unlock a host of innovations (digital signatures, remote banking, e-voting, etc.) that depend on reliable identity verification.

Of course, implementing a national digital ID is a journey with challenges to navigate, but the overall trajectory is clearly toward wider adoption. The trend is one of support and optimism that these technologies, when deployed responsibly, can greatly strengthen the identity layer of our digital infrastructure. As governments continue to refine their systems – improving privacy protections, ensuring inclusion, and adopting interoperability standards – digital identity cards and apps will likely become as commonplace as physical IDs, if not more so. In an increasingly online world, having a secure and convenient way to prove “I am me” is foundational. The cases of the US, UK, Europe, and pioneering programs globally all point to the conclusion that government-controlled digital identities, done right, are powerful tools for a safer, more efficient society. The future of identification is here, and it’s digital.

Sources:

1. Beeck Center (2023). Guide to U.S. Government Actions on Digital Identity – Highlights the need for a national digital identity strategy in the U.S.​
   digitalgovernmenthub.org.
2. UK Government Digital Service (2023). GOV.UK One Login Documentation – Describes how the UK’s One Login verifies users with ID documents and biometric checks​
   sign-in.service.gov.uk.
3. TSA (2023). Digital ID and Facial Recognition at TSA – Explains how TSA is accepting mobile IDs and using facial recognition to verify traveler identities​
   tsa.gov.
4. Nextgov (2024). DHS Trials on Liveness Detection – Notes DHS testing of liveness detection to counter spoofing in remote ID verification​
   nextgov.com.
5. e-Estonia (2022). Electronic Identity in Estonia – Reports that 99% of Estonians have a digital ID and no breaches of the system’s cryptographic security in 20 years​
   e-estonia.com.
6. Beyond Encryption (2023). Global Digital ID Innovations – Case studies (Estonia, India, etc.) indicating 99% of Estonians use e-ID, and 1.3 billion Aadhaar IDs issued in India, reducing fraud in benefits​
   beyondencryption.com.
7. Chandler Institute (2021). Aadhaar: E-Government in India – Details Aadhaar’s scale and impact, including 94% population coverage and ~$10B annual savings by cutting subsidy fraud​
   chandlerinstitute.org.

‍